Skurtchasor (skurtchasor) wrote in roleplayers,
Skurtchasor
skurtchasor
roleplayers

Ever hear of "Try before you buy?"

It saddens me to see the number of people who rushed to get a copy of D&D 3.5 based only on the promises of WoTC and the unreliable medium of internet gossip. What's so horrible about continuing to run under 3.0 for a while, until you get the chance to peruse the 3.5 books and see FOR YOURSELF if they're worthwhile or not? If this trend of mindless buying continues, the big gaming companies are going to realize they can put out a substandard/unfinished product (take a look at the potential errata list that's out for 3.5 already) and still make a lot of money off it. Let's try and have some standards, people.

I'm not claiming 3.5 is a horrible system--I can't make that call, having not seen the books yet. But I'm not going to assume that a newer edition necessarily means a better one (computer software provides a wonderful conuterexample to this). Even if 3.5 turns out to be the most wonderful thing is existence, I'm not going to drop $60, waste my time converting old characters and learning all of the subtle changes between editions, just so I can keep "official" and "current" with WoTC's vision of the best set of rules. Incidentally, if you've bought 3.5 and you really like it, I'm happy that you got your money's worth. But I don't think it's a good buy for me.

In closing I leave you with the following blurb from WoTC: "a person with the 3rd edition PHB and 3.5 PHB can sit down and not even know they are playing different edtions." What a crock that turned out to be.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 34 comments